Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Hui ( Re )

T-1843-92

Muldoon J.

25/2/94

14 pp.

Appeal from denial of Canadian citizenship application for failure to meet residence requirement of Citizenship Act, s. 5(1)(c) -- Applicant entered Canada in 1988 with wife and children -- Purchased home, filed income tax, maintained bank accounts, paid provincial medical premiums -- Not terminating employment in Hong Kong until one year after initial entry -- During three years, three months preceding application, absent from Canada 636 days -- Needed 1,095 days in Canada, and had only 558 days -- Citizenship Act, s. 5(1)(c) requiring three years of residence in Canada within four years preceding date of citizenship application -- Application premature as made before residing in Canada over interrupted span of four years -- Without ceasing to be permanent resident, and upon accumulating three years of residence calculated in day-by-day manner one can meet residence criterion -- Day-by-day accumulation of residence expressed in manner bespeaking presence in Canada-Residing in Canada not to be accomplished by being absent from Canada, except pursuant to s. 5(1.1) -- Parliament intended to confer citizenship on persons who have been "in residence" in Canada, for three years during previous four -- Intention to confer citizenship on applicants who have "Canadianized" themselves by residing among Canadians in Canada -- Not accomplished abroad, nor by depositing bank accounts, rental payment, furniture, clothing, goods, spouses, children in Canada, while remaining personally outside Canada -- Term "at least" three years indicating Parliament disregarding fact some applicants Canadianized in less time-Legislator considered potential problem under s. 5(1)(c), and provided for resolution by citizenship judges, but not by Federal Court Judges -- Resolution reserved to Minister's discretion under s. 5(3), in regard to which that citizenship judge may make recommendation -- S. 5(4) according further discretion to waive requirements of Act in cases of special and unusual hardship-Citizenship Judge deciding against such affirmative recommendation-Federal Court not empowered to intervene with that decision-Power of retro-reference must be conferred by specific legislation-No such specific jurisdiction in Citizenship Act -- Appellant's lack of prescribed time of residence in Canada, prematurity of initial application, leading to conclusion appeal should be dismissed-Citizenship Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. 29, s. 5(1)(c),(3),(4).

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.