Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Confédération des syndicats nationaux v. Canada ( Employment Insurance Commission )

T-2586-97

Morneau P.

3/2/98

10 pp.

Application for judicial review against employment insurance scheme as established by Employment Insurance Act-Two motions before Court in relation to application-In first motion, applicant relying on Federal Court Act, s. 18.4(2) to have its application treated and proceeded with as an action-In second motion, respondents seeking dismissal of applicant's application on ground application not relating to particular decision, order or matter-Applicant seeking declaratory judgment against number of general actions of respondents-Those actions, allegedly both illegal and unconstitutional, consist of fact respondents allegedly approved, used and allocated surpluses in employment insurance account for purposes other than paying benefits-For application for judicial review to Federal Court, certain basic requirements must be met which are more than mere questions of procedure-It must first relate to decision or order of federal board, commission or tribunal under Federal Court Act, ss. 18(1) and 18.1(2)-Application not identifying specific provisions of Employment Insurance Act-Appears to identify primary and sole source of its attack as lying directly in those legislative provisions and not in terms of decision of federal board, commission or tribunal-This part of application cannot be seen as resulting from decision of federal board, commission or tribunal-Entire application should be dismissed for that reason alone-Application relating to number of acts by executive without ever really identifying one by its date and details-Application fails to comply with requirements for judicial review application and should be dismissed-Respondent's motion to dismiss allowed-Federal Court Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. F-7, ss. 18(1) (am. by S.C. 1990, c. 8, s. 4), 18.1(2) (as enacted, idem, s. 5), 18.4(2) (as enacted, idem)-Employment Insurance Act, S.C. 1996, c. 23.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.