Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Subuncuo v. Canada ( Minister of Employment and Immigration )

92-T-1555

Reed J.

4/12/92

2 pp.

Application to extend time to file and serve written submissions in response to application for leave pursuant to s. 82.1 to commence s. 18.1 proceeding -- Delay by adjudicator in forwarding transcript of hearing not justifiable -- In requesting extension, respondent essentially using own conduct as ground for delay -- No good reasons why tapes could not be used to avoid delay arising as result of waiting for preparation of transcript -- Continually arising delays becoming endemic to system intended to operate quickly -- Had applicant requested copy of tape and not been provided with one, extension would have been refused and application decided on basis of material on file -- Since applicant requested transcript, not tape, and respondent seeking extension, application granted -- Immigration Act, R.S.C., c. I-2, s. 82.1 (as enacted by R.S.C., 1985 (4th Supp.), c. 28, s. 19; S.C. 1990, c. 8, s. 53) -- Federal Court Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. F-7, s. 18.1 (as enacted by S.C. 1990, c. 8, s. 5).

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.