EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
Judicial review of Umpire’s decision person not accumulating violation as result of issuance of notice of warning, i.e. only monetary penalty triggering application of Employment Insurance Act, S.C. 1996, c. 23, s. 7.1(4)(a)—Warning issued instead of imposition of monetary penalty as result of false representation by respondent pursuant to s. 41.1—S. 7.1(4)(a) providing insured person accumulating violation if Commission issuing notice of violation where penalty imposed under s. 41.1—Canada (Attorney General) v. Piovesan, 2006 FCA 245, holding warning to be treated as penalty, followed—Application allowed.
Canada (Attorney General) v. Maxwell (A-463-05, 2006 FCA 371, Linden J.A., judgment dated 14/11/06, 3 pp.)
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.