Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Merck Frosst Canada Inc. v. Canada ( Minister of National Health and Welfare )

T-1306-93

Nadon J.

31/1/95

5 pp.

Applications for leave to file affidavits to which attached as exhibits cross-examination, draft affidavits of Novopharm representatives -- Purpose of affidavits to introduce into record statements made by representatives of Novopharm casting doubt over, or contradicting statements by respondent Apotex in notice of allegations -- Applications dismissed -- As not made on interlocutory motion, affidavits should be limited to facts within deponents' personal knowledge -- Affidavits constituting hearsay -- S.C.C. enunciating exception to hearsay rule in R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531 -- Governing principles for admission of hearsay evidence reliability of evidence, necessity: R. v. Smith, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 915 -- No evidence applicants, prior to making present application, made any attempt to obtain from representative of Novopharm affidavit which could be introduced in present record -- Necessary to demonstrate reliability, necessity of hearsay evidence because whenever hearsay admitted into evidence other side effectively deprived of right to cross-examine -- Admitting affidavits into record highly prejudicial to Apotex since applicants not demonstrating necessity -- Necessity component of hearsay exception not demonstrated -- Federal Court Rules, C.R.C., c. 663, R. 332(1).

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.