Information on Appeals

Decision Information

Decision Content

APPEALS NOTED

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

Applications for leave to appeal

Brent Kern Family Trust v. Canada, A-375-13, 2014 FCA 230, Near J.A., judgment dated October 14, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused April 9, 2015.

Coombs v. Canada (Attorney General), A-147-14, A-148-14, 2014 FCA 222, Boivin J.A., judgment dated October 7, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused April 2, 2015.

Coote v. Lawyers’ Professional Indemnity Company (LAWPRO), A-104-13, A-150-13, Noël C.J., order dated October 29, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused April 9, 2015.

Coote v. Lawyers’ Professional Indemnity Company (LAWPRO), A-228-13, Sharlow J.A., order dated September 8, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused April 9, 2015.

Coote v. Ormston et al., A-409-12, A-410-12, A-411-12, Noël C.J., Dawson and Gauthier JJ.A., order dated October 29, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused April 16, 2015.

Coote v. Theroulde et al., A-465-12, A-466-12, A-467-12, Noël C.J., Dawson and Gauthier JJ.A., order dated October 29, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused April 9, 2015.

Dennis v. Canada, A-436-13, 2014 FCA 232, Nadon J.A., judgment dated October 15, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused April 9, 2015.

Enoch Cree Nation v. Canada, A-75-14, 2014 FCA 256, Nadon J.A., judgment dated November 3, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused April 16, 2015.

Immunovaccine Technologies Inc. v. Canada, A-171-13, 2014 FCA 196, Boivin J.A., judgment dated September 11, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused March 26, 2015.

Landry et al. v. Canada (Attorney General), 14-A-66, Nadon J.A., order dated December 5, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused April 9, 2015.

Piersanti v. Canada, A-317-13, 2014 FCA 243, Trudel J.A., judgment dated October 28, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused April 16, 2015.

Tahmourpour v. Canada (Human Rights Commission), A-382-13, 2014 FCA 204, Nadon J.A., judgment dated September 17, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused March 26, 2015.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.