APPEALS NOTED
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
Scheuneman v. Canada (Attorney General), [2000] 2 F.C. 365 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-795-99), reasons for judgment handed down 1/12/00.
Zündel v. Canada (Attorney General), [1999] 4 F.C. 289 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-388-99), reasons for judgment handed down 13/12/00.
Novopharm Ltd. v. Bayer Inc., [2000] 2 F.C. 553 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-770-99), reasons for judgment handed down 14/11/00.
Jekula v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 1 F.C. 266 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-57-99), reasons for judgment handed down 27/11/00.
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
Applications for leave to appeal
Zündel v. Canada (Human Rights Commission), [2000] 4 F.C. 255 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 14/12/00.
Zündel v. Canada (Attorney General), [2000] 3 F.C. D-31 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 14/12/00.
Whirlpool Corp. v. Camco Inc., [1999] 2 F.C. D-48 (C.A.), was affirmed by a decision dated 15/12/00, and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.
Zündel v. Citron, [2000] 4 F.C. 225 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 14/12/00.